@cooperj@aldendirks I have set this one up, again with the atlasing about as good as I can manage based on the limited data available to us. If there are more sources to use for this, please send them my way. Couldn't find anything on Asia, so I lumped them all into pinicola s.s. @alan_rockefeller if you have data that might be helpful in this, that would be appreciated, too. I know the sampling in California in that paper was relatively poor, especially with so many observations on iNat.
For the observations outside of the atlased zones, they should only be kicked up to the Fomitopsis pinicola complex (which I made recently), so not all the way to genus. That should still be pretty manageable.
חילוקי דעות לא מכוונים מתרחשים כאשר הורה (B) עובר דילול באמצעות החלפת צאצא (E) אל חלק אחר בעץ הטקסונומי, מה שגורם לזיהויים קיימים של ההורה להתפרש כחילוקי דעות עם זיהויים קיימים של הצאצא שהוחלף.
Identification
זיהוי 2 של טקסוןE יהיה חילוקי דעות לא מכוונים עם זיהוי 1 של טקסון B לאחר החלפת הטקסון
אם דילול של הורה גורם ליותר מ-10 חילוקים דעות לא מכוונים, כדאי לך לפצל את ההורה לאחר החלפת הצאצא כדי להחליף זיהויים קיימים של הורה (B) בזיהויים לא סותרים.
@cooperj @aldendirks I have set this one up, again with the atlasing about as good as I can manage based on the limited data available to us. If there are more sources to use for this, please send them my way. Couldn't find anything on Asia, so I lumped them all into pinicola s.s. @alan_rockefeller if you have data that might be helpful in this, that would be appreciated, too. I know the sampling in California in that paper was relatively poor, especially with so many observations on iNat.
For the observations outside of the atlased zones, they should only be kicked up to the Fomitopsis pinicola complex (which I made recently), so not all the way to genus. That should still be pretty manageable.