Hi @birdwhisperer don't you think it would be better to first switch C. mongolus to A. mongolus?
This way, the uncertainly ID'd specimens would still be under Anarhynchus, unless I'm mistaken?

EDIT: I checked the ID analysis tool and it seems that everything will end up being Anarhynchus. All is good then :)

Checking the "outside ranges" I found a few places that weren't in the atlas, like Shanghai and Macao.
Let's review these several times before validating

These are the ebird overlap areas: For the moment, records in the following regions have been unchanged by eBird Central (although some may be refined in the coming weeks with feedback from local experts): Mongolia, most of China (except Xizang and Qinhai = Tibetan and the coast from Fujian north = Siberian); note that coastal records from Guangdong south likely involve Siberian primarily, Macao and Hong Kong, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Borneo, Sulawesi, Lesser Sundas, Cocos and Keeling Islands.

Have adjusted the atlases according to the eBird text. I think it’s OK to commit now