The subspecies conica of tridentata was already not recognized by differented authors as it looks closer to lactea species. The paper of Trávníček et al., 2021 is convincing in using much more suitable genetic tools for species with rapid radiation than most of the precedent papers (using ITS, ...). It is therefore misleading to refer to this paper to give the species status for N. conica as they clearlely explained that they results conducetd to the subspecies status of Neotinea lactea ssp. conica. As Powo does refer to the original combination of N. conica by Bateman (2003) that followed its precedent combinatrion of N. tridentata ssp. conica in 1997, this 2021 more recent paper should conduct to correct again the combination with the new proposal.
חילוקי דעות לא מכוונים מתרחשים כאשר הורה (B) עובר דילול באמצעות החלפת צאצא (E) אל חלק אחר בעץ הטקסונומי, מה שגורם לזיהויים קיימים של ההורה להתפרש כחילוקי דעות עם זיהויים קיימים של הצאצא שהוחלף.
Identification
זיהוי 2 של טקסוןE יהיה חילוקי דעות לא מכוונים עם זיהוי 1 של טקסון B לאחר החלפת הטקסון
אם דילול של הורה גורם ליותר מ-10 חילוקים דעות לא מכוונים, כדאי לך לפצל את ההורה לאחר החלפת הצאצא כדי להחליף זיהויים קיימים של הורה (B) בזיהויים לא סותרים.
The subspecies conica of tridentata was already not recognized by differented authors as it looks closer to lactea species. The paper of Trávníček et al., 2021 is convincing in using much more suitable genetic tools for species with rapid radiation than most of the precedent papers (using ITS, ...). It is therefore misleading to refer to this paper to give the species status for N. conica as they clearlely explained that they results conducetd to the subspecies status of Neotinea lactea ssp. conica. As Powo does refer to the original combination of N. conica by Bateman (2003) that followed its precedent combinatrion of N. tridentata ssp. conica in 1997, this 2021 more recent paper should conduct to correct again the combination with the new proposal.