היומן של donalddavesne

This solution creates new infraorders under suborder Sauria:

Infraorders (under Sauria):

https://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/1563904-Scincomorpha
https://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/1563906-Anguimorpha
https://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/1563907-Iguania
https://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/1567777-Lacertoidea
https://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/1567781-Dibamia

Parvorders under Iguania:
https://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/1567779-Pleurodonta
https://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/1567778-Acrodonta

Parvorder under Lacertoidea:
https://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/1567780-Amphisbaenia

An alternative solution would be to have all the infraorders as Suborders and get rid of Sauria entirely. This is the solution I would personally favour, but the consensus among reptile curators is that Sauria is useful, even if paraphyletic.

Following Hughes et al. (2023), Systematic Biology, Baliga & Law (2016), Mol. Phyl. Evol. and other molecular phylogenies, I propose to split Labridae into tribes, the same level as the already existing Scarini (parrotfishes).

New tribe-level taxa:
https://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/1541883-Hypsigenyini
https://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/1541884-Cirrhilabrini
https://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/1541885-Labrini
https://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/1541886-Cheilinini
https://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/1541887-Novaculini
https://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/1541888-Pseudolabrini
https://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/1541889-Julidini