Taxonomic Merge 92157 (הועלה ב 2021-05-18)

Included in this article

נוסף על־ידי stevejones בתאריך מאי 17, 2021 08:15 אחה"צ | הופעל על־ידי stevejones בתאריך מאי 18, 2021
מוזג לתוך

תגובות

פורסם על-ידי stevejones לפני 7 חודשים (סמן)

Could someone please post a link to the paper prescribing the taxon change? Or the title of the paper and author(s)? I haven't yet found it.

פורסם על-ידי joshua_tx לפני 7 חודשים (סמן)

Ok, I think I found the paper in question although not sure how to access it:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/taxon.65.1.47?seq=1

פורסם על-ידי joshua_tx לפני 7 חודשים (סמן)
פורסם על-ידי stevejones לפני 7 חודשים (סמן)

I agree. I verified that there are no homonyms published by other authors. There will be no problem with this.

פורסם על-ידי oscargsol לפני 7 חודשים (סמן)

This name change is really going to hurt... I'm afraid I don't know much about it but the change looks supported.
I don't know anything about Condalia lycoides.

פורסם על-ידי nathantaylor לפני 7 חודשים (סמן)

I know, I'll miss it too. I always hear "Ziziphus obtusifolia" in my mind in the voice of a startled W. C. Fields.
According to POWO, Condalia lycoides is a synonym of what's now Sarcomphagus obtusifolius; it was rattling around loose in the iNat database.

פורסם על-ידי stevejones לפני 7 חודשים (סמן)

Thanks so much for link Steve, I appreciate it. The paper does indeed call for this merge among a number of other taxon changes in the Rhamnaceae. Seems quite thorough and well done (of course as it should be) without taking any liberties beyond what the data prescribes and these changes seem likely to hold for a long time. I don't see a reason for any variances from this new taxonomy or any reason to delay aligning to this new taxonomy. Although it's going to be hard to undo Ziziphus obtusifolia being forever stamped in my mind.

פורסם על-ידי joshua_tx לפני 7 חודשים (סמן)

הוספת תגובה

כניסה או הרשמה להוספת הערות