Euphorbia cryptorubra

The paper is out! The paper describing Euphorbia cryptorubra as a new species is officially out. Here is the link to the paper for anyone interested: http://brit.org/webfm_send/1631

I also posted the observation. For now, it is IDed as Euphorbia.

פורסם על-ידי nathantaylor nathantaylor, יולי 28, 2016 04:30 אחה"צ

תצפיות

תמונות/קולות

מתצפת/ת

nathantaylor

תאריך

יולי 27, 2015 06:05 PM CDT

תיאור

NCT 635. Euphorbia cryptorubra. Reference: Taylor & Terry. 2016. Euphorbia cryptorubra (Euphorbiaceae), a new species in Euphorbia subgenus Chamaesyce section Anisophyllum from Texas, U.S.A. and Chihuahua, Mexico. J. Bot. Res. Inst. 10:1–9.

תגיות

תגובות

I think i'd said it earlier, but even so , Congratulations! Don't forget to celebrate

פורסם על-ידי ellen5 לפני בערך 5 שנים (סמן)

Thanks!

פורסם על-ידי nathantaylor לפני בערך 5 שנים (סמן)

Congratulations! I'll read the paper before confirming the ID.

פורסם על-ידי stevejones לפני בערך 5 שנים (סמן)

An interesting and thorough paper, and great illustrations! Thanks for the etymology section, too - I was trying to make sense of "hidden red." Thanks also for the references concerning the recent treatment of the genus Chamaesyce. When I was a baby botanist, they were included within Euphorbia, and now they're back! I'm looking forward to reading up on why.

פורסם על-ידי stevejones לפני בערך 5 שנים (סמן)

Congratulations!
Thanks for sharing your knowledge with us on iNat.

פורסם על-ידי connlindajo לפני בערך 5 שנים (סמן)

Thanks! @stevejones , I'm glad you liked it! The main reason Chamaesyce is back in Euphorbia is that it is well nested phylogenetically within the rest of Euphorbia such that it can't be cut out as a separate genus without either making a lot of genera that might not make sense or haveing a paraphyletic group (Chamaesyce is monophyletic but the recognition of Chamaesyces would make the rest of Euphorbia in what is now classified as E. subg. Chamaesyce paraphyletic). I'm still holding out some hope that the group can be teased apart into more genera in a way that morphologically makes sense but it doesn't look like it at this point. Another group classically treated as a separate genus is Pedilanthus which looks very different from most other Euphorbias. @connlindajo , My pleasure!

פורסם על-ידי nathantaylor לפני בערך 5 שנים (סמן)

Such a great accomplishment. :) Congrats, Nathan. :)

פורסם על-ידי sambiology לפני בערך 5 שנים (סמן)

Thanks!

פורסם על-ידי nathantaylor לפני בערך 5 שנים (סמן)

הוספת תגובה

כניסה או הרשמה להוספת הערות